The Crow's Eye: Pardon Me

"...it's not the training to be mean but the training to be kind that is used to keep us leashed best." ~ Black Dog Red

"In case you haven't recognized the trend: it proceeds action, dissent, speech." ~ davidly, on how wars get done

"...What sort of meager, unerotic existence must a man live to find himself moved to such ecstatic heights by the mundane sniping of a congressional budget fight. The fate of human existence does not hang in the balance. The gods are not arrayed on either side. Poseiden, earth-shaker, has regrettably set his sights on the poor fishermen of northern Japan and not on Washington, D.C. where his ire might do some good--I can think of no better spot for a little wetland reclamation project, if you know what I mean. The fight is neither revolution nor apocalypse; it is hardly even a fight. A lot of apparatchiks are moving a lot of phony numbers with more zeros than a century of soccer scores around, weaving a brittle chrysalis around a gross worm that, some time hence, will emerge, untransformed, still a worm." ~ IOZ

Nov 25, 2010

Pardon Me

Leonard Peltier still rots in prison. Turkey goes free. Need I type more?

4 comments:

Big Bad Bald Bastard said...: The whole Peltier case just reeks of the paranoid '60s "infiltration of SDS and civil rights organizations" badness, and the carry-over of the paranoid J.E. Hoover style. Just a whole lot of ugliness.; November 29, 2010 at 2:49 PM
Jack Crow said...: I don't even think that AIM is "guilt free" in the sense that the membership was ignorant of consequences or a certain deliberate hostility towards the federal state, BBBB.

Then again, I was rooting for them to do a whole lot worse, so...; November 29, 2010 at 2:59 PM
Randal Graves said...: Because he's just one man. How the hell are you going to effectively imprison 70 million Turks?; November 30, 2010 at 9:06 AM
Jack Crow said...: Heh. Worth the loss of coffee, Randal.; November 30, 2010 at 9:55 AM

Post a Comment

This one took a while to put into words.

I don't kid myself that I've stumbled upon a unique insight and I have little doubt that someone has already written or said this better than I. Five minutes after I hit the "publish" button, I'll probably regret the choice of words more than I already do now - because it's difficult to get my head outside of English language usage, to comment on a problem with that usage, whilst using the English language to do so.

In the interest of not making more of an ass of myself than necessary, I've pared a very long thesis down to a paragraph:

I find it troubling that, using English, I have very limited choice in expressing how I relate to people with whom I have ongoing interaction. If I want to reference the nature of my relations with the woman who has challenged me to grow in ways I never imagined possible, the woman who howled with a primal, gorgeous, earth shattering, mother bear of a refrain, transcending pain and pleasure in act of creation to which I will never be immediate party, who has with her defiant and proud womanhood still intact forged a family out of disparate parts - I have to write "my wife." I have to reduce her to property. That really pisses me off. I don't own her. I don't fucking want the title or the claim. I don't want to express possession, simply to refer to her (without writing a discursive dissertation). I don't like one bit that the short hand for "association" in English is expressed in the possessive. I don't own my wife or my children. They're not mine.

So, fuck you Latin and Germanic branches of the Indo-European language group.

That is all.