The Crow's Eye: In Actual News

"...it's not the training to be mean but the training to be kind that is used to keep us leashed best." ~ Black Dog Red

"In case you haven't recognized the trend: it proceeds action, dissent, speech." ~ davidly, on how wars get done

"...What sort of meager, unerotic existence must a man live to find himself moved to such ecstatic heights by the mundane sniping of a congressional budget fight. The fate of human existence does not hang in the balance. The gods are not arrayed on either side. Poseiden, earth-shaker, has regrettably set his sights on the poor fishermen of northern Japan and not on Washington, D.C. where his ire might do some good--I can think of no better spot for a little wetland reclamation project, if you know what I mean. The fight is neither revolution nor apocalypse; it is hardly even a fight. A lot of apparatchiks are moving a lot of phony numbers with more zeros than a century of soccer scores around, weaving a brittle chrysalis around a gross worm that, some time hence, will emerge, untransformed, still a worm." ~ IOZ

Oct 25, 2010

In Actual News

Bill Clinton has left Haiti.

Haiti remains.

Haitians, especially in Port-au-Prince, now face cholera.

Bill Clinton's teevee spots do not stop infection or the degradation of the Haitian people. Neither does texting a bank transfer on the cell phone, the price of which could buy actual medicine, food and clean water for hundreds of people.

4 comments:

JM said...: someone's been blocking the aid:

http://blogs.alternet.org/jacobfreeze/2010/10/12/zero-us-aid-delivered-to-haiti-9-months-after-earthquake/; October 25, 2010 at 6:11 PM
Jack Crow said...: Of course they are. People with prospects are better equipped to resist Disneygentrification.; October 25, 2010 at 9:20 PM
JM said...: Of course, said aid could've been used to buy all the needs you suggested.; October 26, 2010 at 12:30 AM
Peter Ward said...: Don't worry, Sean Penn's on it: http://www.eonline.com/uberblog/marc_malkin/b207628_sean_penn_chokes_up_thanks_obama.html.; October 26, 2010 at 7:00 PM

Post a Comment

This one took a while to put into words.

I don't kid myself that I've stumbled upon a unique insight and I have little doubt that someone has already written or said this better than I. Five minutes after I hit the "publish" button, I'll probably regret the choice of words more than I already do now - because it's difficult to get my head outside of English language usage, to comment on a problem with that usage, whilst using the English language to do so.

In the interest of not making more of an ass of myself than necessary, I've pared a very long thesis down to a paragraph:

I find it troubling that, using English, I have very limited choice in expressing how I relate to people with whom I have ongoing interaction. If I want to reference the nature of my relations with the woman who has challenged me to grow in ways I never imagined possible, the woman who howled with a primal, gorgeous, earth shattering, mother bear of a refrain, transcending pain and pleasure in act of creation to which I will never be immediate party, who has with her defiant and proud womanhood still intact forged a family out of disparate parts - I have to write "my wife." I have to reduce her to property. That really pisses me off. I don't own her. I don't fucking want the title or the claim. I don't want to express possession, simply to refer to her (without writing a discursive dissertation). I don't like one bit that the short hand for "association" in English is expressed in the possessive. I don't own my wife or my children. They're not mine.

So, fuck you Latin and Germanic branches of the Indo-European language group.

That is all.