Wherein Skookum lays down some truth about Sara, Hunter of Sedition:
"Still, the fundamental message littered throughout her tiresome rant is that the legitimacy of the US Government and Emperor Obama must not be challenged; the democratic process of bribery, thievery, and money-laundering by Congress and the White House is sacrosanct!"
I wonder if Mrs. Robinson understands the awful joke Lady Irony has played on her. At the very height of her campaign to classify Tea Party attendees as the vanguard of fascism, as seditious threats to state order, Imperial Barack hauls off and decides he's got authority I don't think even Caligula ever had under law.
Crow's Eye: Maintaining a commitment to Pointless Acrimony™ and Hate Filled Invective™! Also available in corvid mischief and traditional sly dog's mistrust.
5 comments:
Against better instinct, I turned on the telly to find "noted liberal" Ed Schultz parsing a defense of execution without trial under the aegis of taking out a "top recruiter" for "Al Qaeda."
Chew that.
Uncle Sam ought to kill him because he discusses his (yes, to all appearances, odious) ideology with others and following e-mail exchanges, some of them sign up for a bit of the jihad.
Kill him because he persuades people to fight Uncle Sam.
That's some kind of shit.
I don't really get the conspiracy theory thing, but the cynical lobe of my brain wonders how soon until definiton for "killable," for opposition to Uncle Sam, expands.
This is quite somethin' too:
http://www.blackagendareport.com/?q=content/comeback-chattel-slavery-remarkable-revelations-top-obama-aide
Nice satire.
It is satire, of course, but the line between satire and reality is at this point pretty much just a technicality. Beyond the fact that our prison system is literal slavery, and our wage employment system is essentially little different, what line is there between taking upon yourself the right to kill people at will and the right to own them?
I can't stop thinking about how this "sedition" crap is coming out in such force right at the same time as this whole "murdering enemies of the state is totally legal no matter what" gets a public airing. Spooky.
It's a good question.
I'm not sure that we'll get to the point where Americans will be able to purchase other Americans (well, other than baseball owners).
But buying up the contract of a labor gang, and having the baseball exclusion extended to cover other industries?
There's probably a chain of causation that might result in that or a similar outcome.
Post a Comment